Trueness, physical properties, and surface characteristics of additive-manufactured zirconia crown.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a comparison of trueness and physical and surface properties among five distinct types of additive manufactured (AM) zirconia crowns and zirconia crowns produced using the subtractive manufacturing (SM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia crowns were fabricated using five distinct techniques, each varying in the method of slurry transfer and photocuring source. Each experimental group utilized either one of the four digital light processing (DLP)-based techniques (DLP spreading, DLP spreading gradation, DLP vat and DLP circular spreading) or the stereolithography (SLA)-based technique (SLA spreading). The control (CON) group employed SM. To assess accuracy, trueness was measured between the scan and reference data. To analyze the physical properties, voids were examined using high-energy spiral micro-computed tomography scans, and the crystal structure analysis was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Surface roughness was assessed through laser scanning microscopy. RESULTS: Differences in the trueness of internal surfaces of crowns were found among the groups (P < 0.05). Trueness varied across the measurement surfaces (occlusal, lateral, and marginal) in all the groups except for the DLP spreading gradation group (P < 0.05). Voids were observed in all AM groups. All groups showed similar XRD patterns. All AM groups showed significantly greater surface roughness compared to the CON group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The AM zirconia crowns showed bubbles and a rougher surface compared to the SM crowns. All groups exhibited typical zirconia traits and trueness levels within clinically acceptable limits, suggesting that current zirconia AM techniques could be suitable for dental applications.

Shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cements on zirconia: The light-blocking effect of a zirconia crown.

Abstract Background/purpose: The presence of restorative material between resin cement and the light-curing unit can reduce light transmission. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the light-blocking effect of zirconia crown on shear bond strength (SBS) between three dual-cured resin cements and the zirconia surface. Materials and methods: Sixty zirconia specimens were prepared and divided into three groups according to the type of resin cement [RXU (RelyX Ultimate); SC2 (SmartCem2); MEC (Maxcem Elite Chroma)]. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, with or without a 1-mm-thick zirconia crown (n = 10). The specimens were light-cured from five different directions for 20 s each. All specimens were thermocycled 5000 times and subjected to SBS testing, followed by scanning electron microscope examination. Results: The presence of a 1-mm-thick zirconia crown had no significant effect on the SBS in all resin cements. However, the SBS was significantly affected by type of resin cement. RXU showed the highest SBS (8.35 MPa with crown; 8.57 MPa without crown), followed by SC2 (5.48 MPa with crown; 5.57 without crown) and then MEC (3.37 MPa with crown; 4.04 MPa without crown. Fractured surfaces exhibited varying degrees of mixed failure patterns. Conclusion: A 1-mm-thick zirconia crown material between the light source and the dual-cured resin cement did not significantly influence the SBS of the resin cements on the zirconia substrates. RXU exhibited the highest SBS regardless of zirconia crown coverage. With sufficient light-curing, dual-cured resin cements can be a good choice for zirconia crown cementation.

Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Three-dimensional (3D) printers should be capable of fabricating products with high accuracy for potential use in a wide range of dental applications. The trueness and surface characteristics of 3D-printed casts made with different technologies remain unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and surface characteristics of 4 types of dental casts printed using 6 different 3D printers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four dental casts prepared for intracoronal and extracoronal restorations were printed using 6 different 3D printers-2 printers of each printing technology (FDM: Creator, Lugo; DLP: D2, ND5100; SLA: Form 2, Form 3). The printed casts were scanned to obtain standard tessellation language (STL) data sets that were superimposed onto the reference to evaluate their trueness (n=15). Trueness was measured based on overall deviations for each cast and for sectional deviations within the cavities. For qualitative evaluation, the surface characteristics of the 3D-printed casts were analyzed by using a digital camera, stereomicroscope, and scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple Mann-Whitney U tests for pairwise comparisons among groups (α=.05). RESULTS: The overall median trueness values were lowest with the Form 3 (27.9 µm), followed by the ND5100 (30.0 µm), Lugo (37.1 µm), D2 (41.4 µm), Form 2 (46.9 µm), and Creator (83.3 µm) (P<.05). Sectional deviations within the cavity were generally greater than overall deviation. Macroscopic and microscopic images showed that the reproduced casts had the smoothest surface with the SLA, followed by the DLP and FDM printers. Horizontal layers were more discernible with the FDM printer. CONCLUSIONS: The trueness of the 3D-printed casts was influenced by the type of tooth preparation and was printer dependent. Among the tested 3D printers, the Form 3 produced the most accurate casts, while the Creator produced the least accurate casts.